back to top
Thursday, May 2, 2024

Trending Stories

Table of Contents

●  Introduction

Related Posts

- Advertisement -

An AI-powered health chatbot struggles with accuracy

Explore the challenges and developments of WHO's new AI health assistant, SARAH, which provides health information but may not always be accurate.

The World Organisation (WHO) has embarked on an innovative project using to disseminate basic health information via a human-like avatar. This venture introduces SARAH, a virtual health assistant designed to offer 24/7 support in eight languages on topics such as mental health and nutrition. However, the WHO cautions on its website that this early prototype, launched on April 2, might not always deliver precise answers.

Challenges with current AI technology

SARAH, or Smart AI Resource Assistant for Health, cannot diagnose, similar to platforms like WebMD or Google. Instead, it directs users to WHO resources or advises consulting with healthcare providers. Despite its empathetic design, SARAH's responses can sometimes be misleading due to its outdated training data and the inherent limitations of its AI model, which include generating incorrect or “hallucinated” answers.

Ramin Javan, a radiologist and researcher at George Washington University, remarked, “It lacks depth, but I think it's because they just don't want to overstep their boundaries, and this is just the first step.” WHO asserts that SARAH is meant to complement the work of human health professionals rather than replace them.

AI's potential and pitfalls

Image credit: AI Business

Trained on OpenAI's ChatGPT 3.5 with data up to September 2021, SARAH does not have information on more recent medical developments or advisories. For example, it incorrectly stated that the Alzheimer's drug Lecanemab was still in clinical trials, although it was approved in January 2023 for early disease treatment. Even WHO's latest statistics can confound SARAH, requiring multiple prompts to fetch the correct information.

In its efforts to simulate empathy, SARAH analyses users' facial expressions for 30 seconds before deleting this data, ensuring anonymity. WHO's communications director, Jaimie Guerra, highlights the privacy measures in place to secure these interactions, stating that all sessions are unlinked from any identifiable data to prevent cybersecurity risks.

Future directions and ethical considerations

The development of SARAH builds on WHO's previous virtual health worker, Florence, and involves the same New Zealand-based company, Soul Machines, for the creation of the avatars. While the current avatar appears white, there is potential for users to select from a variety of avatars in future iterations to enhance personalisation.

WHO recently issued ethical guidelines for the use of AI in health care, emphasising data transparency and user safety. As AI continues to evolve, the integration of these technologies in public health remains a delicate balance between innovation and accuracy.

Tech Edition has partnerships that involve sponsored content. While this financial support helps us with daily operations, it doesn't affect the integrity of our reviews. We remain committed to delivering honest and insightful content to our readers.

Tech Edition is now on Telegram! Join our channel here and catch all the latest tech news!

Emma Job
Emma Job
Emma is a freelance news editor at Tech Edition. With a decade's experience in content writing, she revels in both crafting and immersing herself in narratives. From tracking down viral trends to delving into the most recent news stories, her goal is to deliver insightful and timely content to her readers.

Featured Content

Dreame X30 Ultra vs X30 Master: Which robot vacuum is better for you?

Compare the Dreame X30 Ultra and X30 Master, featuring the latest cleaning technology. Discover key differences in pricing, features, and dock systems to choose the best robot vacuum-mop for your Singapore home.

Latest Stories

Related Stories