Friday, 26 December 2025
26.9 C
Singapore
22.7 C
Thailand
20.4 C
Indonesia
26.3 C
Philippines

X now lets blocked users view posts despite privacy concerns

[output_post_excerpt]

Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, has rolled out a controversial change to its block function, sparking privacy and safety concerns among users and experts alike. This update now allows blocked users to see posts from the accounts that have blocked them. However, they cannot interact with those accounts through likes, comments, or messages.

This shift marks a major departure from how the block feature traditionally functioned on X. Previously, it primarily restricted and blocked users from viewing any posts from accounts that chose to block them. The new policy, first announced in September, has been implemented and is stirring debate on its potential impacts.

How the new block function works

Under this revised block system, users who have been blocked can now view posts from accounts that chose to block them. For example, a user blocked by a public figure or a well-known account can still see that account’s posts, though they remain unable to engage directly. X displays a message below such posts, informing the blocked viewer, “You can view public posts from this account, but you are blocked from engaging with them. You also cannot follow or message this account.” Before this update, blocked users were shown a generic “You’re blocked” message and were restricted from viewing any content from the blocking account.

X justifies this change by stating that it reflects what users can already do by switching to a different account that hasn’t been blocked. Additionally, X claims that the previous blocking version could be misused to share and conceal sensitive information about users. The company describes the update as a step towards “greater transparency” on the platform, though all have not received this transparency.

Backlash from experts and users

The response to X’s update has been critical, particularly from experts focusing on social media safety and abuse. Many argue that the change caters to stalkers and trolls, undermining the security of users who rely on the block feature to protect themselves from online harassment.

Claire Waxman, London’s Victims’ Commissioner, was outspoken in her criticism, calling the update a “dangerous decision” that may put vulnerable individuals at risk. Waxman voiced her concerns on social media, writing, “Enabling blocked users to see posts is catering to abusers and stalkers, indulging and facilitating their behaviours.” Numerous users have echoed this sentiment, who feel that the platform’s new approach to blocking could make it more challenging to maintain a safe online space.

In addition to these safety concerns, some users are pointing out that X’s new block function may conflict with guidelines set by major app stores. Apple’s App Store, for example, mandates that apps with user-generated content must provide users the ability to “block abusive users from the service.” Although X has retained the blocking feature in a limited form, it remains uncertain whether Apple or Google will take action in response to the platform’s adjusted approach to blocking.

Users migrate to alternative platforms

As X continues to make changes that many users find troubling, some are turning to alternative social media platforms. Platforms like BlueSky and Threads have gained popularity as users seek safer, more privacy-conscious spaces for social media interactions. Threads, the text-based app developed by Instagram’s parent company Meta, reported today that it has reached 275 million monthly active users, a milestone that reflects an increase of 75 million users over the past three months alone.

For many users, the appeal of platforms like Threads and BlueSky lies in their commitment to offering stronger user controls and maintaining more traditional approaches to features like blocking. As X progresses with its updated block function, it may lose users who prioritise privacy and safety in their social media experiences.

This latest update is part of Elon Musk’s ongoing efforts to reshape X into a platform with fewer restrictions and more open sharing. However, whether the new blocking policy will achieve Musk’s vision of transparency remains in question, especially as experts and users continue to voice concerns over the potential risks to personal safety.

Hot this week

Google delays Gemini takeover from Assistant on Android until 2026

Google has delayed replacing Google Assistant with Gemini on Android, extending the transition into 2026 as technical challenges persist.

Indie Game Awards withdraws Clair Obscur honours over generative AI use

Indie Game Awards withdraws Clair Obscur’s top honours after confirming generative AI assets were used during the game’s production.

Thoughtworks: Singapore’s financial OS upgrade, agentic AI and the race for the future of wealth

How agentic AI could reshape wealth management in Singapore by enhancing personalisation, improving responsiveness and elevating the role of advisers.

ChatGPT for Android may soon offer faster access to specific chats

ChatGPT for Android may add home-screen shortcuts that open specific chats directly, making repeat conversations easier to access.

Samsung unveils Exynos 2600 as first 2nm mobile processor

Samsung unveils the Exynos 2600, the world’s first 2nm mobile chip, expected to debut in the Galaxy S26 in early 2026.

Square Enix releases Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade demo on Switch 2 and Xbox

Free demo for Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade launches on Switch 2 and Xbox, letting players carry progress into the full 2026 release.

AI designs a Linux computer with 843 parts in a single week

Quilter reveals a Linux computer designed by AI in one week, hinting at a future where hardware development is faster and more accessible.

Super Mario Bros inspired Hideo Kojima’s path into game development

Hideo Kojima reveals how Super Mario Bros convinced him that video games could one day surpass movies and led him into game development.

Indie Game Awards withdraws Clair Obscur honours over generative AI use

Indie Game Awards withdraws Clair Obscur’s top honours after confirming generative AI assets were used during the game’s production.

Related Articles

Popular Categories